On Jun 2, 2008, at 9:14 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
i dont think you can compare ZODB to gemstone's products. i've looked
at both over the last few months with a decent level of depth and the
gemstone from a programmer's standpoint is infintately easier to use.
no special classes, no nothing really. just put anything persistent in
a global dictionary and blam its done.
pull it back out and there it is again, object pointers fully intact.
store in 2 different directories, modify in one, blam! modified in the
Christian Theune wrote:
this might be interesting to ZODB users and developers:
What I find interesting is that Python has had such a thing for
about a decade (the ZODB), and a mostly vaporware announcement in
the Ruby world makes such a splash.
ZODB is great but it isnt gemstone's product.
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org