On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: >>> >>> Also feels like a bit of an ask for fixing a deprecation warning bug ;-) >> >> I don't follow that. Isn't that what you did? > > No, I ran an existing test script with two versions of python and verified > that it worked as expected in both cases, with no deprecation warning being > emitted. > >>> This would probably be something to do next time the .fs format changes >>> in >>> such a way that repozo needs updating... >> >> That's not what happened this time is it? > > No. md5 became deprecated, the FileStorage format hasn't changed between > Python 2.4 and 2.6. As far as I'm aware, python versions and .fs formats are > orthogonal ;-) > >> AFAICT, repozo doesn't have automated tests, or this would have been >> caught. This means that repozo is susceptible to breakage at any time. >> I didn't add repozo to ZODB, but without tests, I'd be happy to take >> it out. ;) > > Then how do you backup filestorages? What's the official, supported way of > backing up FileStorages? I'd be more than happy to switch to using that > instead...
There's nothing official or supported about a backup solution without automated tests. So I guess there isn't one. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
