On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris Withers <ch...@simplistix.co.uk> >> wrote: >>> >>> Jim Fulton wrote: >>>> >>>> There's nothing official or supported about a backup solution without >>>> automated tests. >>>> >>>> So I guess there isn't one. >>> >>> Right, so what does Zope Corp use? >> >> We use ZRS, of course. > > Well, ZRS solves the HA challenge the same way as zeoraid, if I understand > correctly, but what about offsite backups and the like?
We replicate to off-site secondaries. > The project I'm currently working on uses repozo to create backups that: > > - get hoovered by the hosting provider's backup mechanisms and rotated > offsite daily > > - get sprayed by rsync over ssh to a DR site on another continent > > How would ZRS solve these problems? I don't know what "these" refers to. ZRS secondaries are hot backups. They can be on- or off-site. >> I'd prefer that there be a file-storage backup solution out of the box. >> repozo is the logical choice. It sounds like it needs some love though. >> This isn't something I'd likely get to soon. > > I'm not sure how much love repozo needs. It works, and it won't need > changing until FileStorage's format changes, which I don't see happening any > time soon. It needs automated tests, at least. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev