On 29.07.13 13:22, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Christian Tismer <tis...@stackless.com> wrote:
Yes, I understand this intention and see no problem:
Just the namespace might be ZODB.Btrees which would not change
the split. They would still live alone, separate projects.
This seems to be a complete red herring. What difference does the
namespace make?
from BTrees.IIBTree import IITree
or
from ZODB.BTrees.IIBTree import IITree
That difference is completely insiginifant in all ways. But making
that change would break all BTree usage in existence. I see no benefit
in that change at all.
Interesting that nobody sees the problem.
If you are always living in Zope world, your claim is understandable ;-)
Here is the sketch of an example::
from durus.btree import BTree
from BTrees.IIBTree import IITree
# ...
# now transform the one into the other...
Here we have no problem because of two facts:
- durus is packaged well,
- BTrees luckily has the plural.
There are other packages floating around, and I just like to work
with many things installed together.
But I agree it would be a bit harder to move it. I was confused and thought
ZODB was already a namespace package.
So let's cook the herring and have it for dinner -- Chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
