-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 07/22/2013 09:15 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
> I agree, this could be part of ZODB and it would be fine.
Splitting out BTrees was a conscious decision to serve two goals:
- - Allow evolving it (in particular, the work to port it to Py3k / PyPy)
without stalling on the larger ZODB project. For ongoing work, it is
useful to be able to release a fix for a BTrees-only bug without needing
to release ZODB.
- - Allow projects which use BTrees (as base classes or attributes) to be
tested without needing to install all of ZODB.
I consider both of those concerns still important, and so am -1 on
re-absorbing BTrees into ZODB.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org