Roshan Perera wrote On 11/07/06 05:35,:
Hi all,
Can someone let me know whether a non global zone can have multiple IP addresses ?
Yes. Yes.
If so can it be serviced by
2 NIC's with IPMP running in the global zone.
Yes. I *must* be managed via IPMP from the global zone. When you configure the non-global zone, you
only need to indicate one interface of the IPMP group.
Steffen
eg: global IP's are
ce0 x.x.x.1
ce0:5 x.x.y.10
Zone1 to have x.x.x.10 using ce0 and also service x.x.y.20 using ce0:5
I have asked the same question previously (attached below) without any luck
with VLAN tagging but this time I'm trying to simplify the problem. Then I can
get the VLAN tagging working.
I am at customer and customer keen to have this done.
Rgds
Roshan
----- Original Message -----
From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, November 6, 2006 11:49 am
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
To: [email protected]
I have VLAN tagging working OK THanks to the James Carlson, Mike
Gerdts, Steffen Weiberle in particular.
Now I have a further question and similar help will be muchly
appreciated.
I have IPMP in 2 interfaces. eg:
Global Zone IP address 10.10.10.5 (IPMP real)
ce0 10.10.10.6 (IPMP test)
ce1 10.10.10.7 (IPMP test)
zone1 IP 10.10.10.10
zone2 IP 10.10.10.20
Currently I have ce610000 and ce610001 configured for the above
and working OK with zones IP's fine.
Now I like the Same IPMP interfaces ce0 and ce1 as above to
service another IP for global and zones. eg:
10.10.20.5 for the global zone
10.10.20.10 for the zone1
10.10.20.20 for the zone2
I assume this is possible. I tried couple of shots at it. But
fails. Can someone kindly help./.
Roshan
----- Original Message -----
From: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 5:18 pm
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
To: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Guys,
Yes, the problem seems to be CR 6367840. As long as the IPMP
interfaces are in FAILED mode non global zones will not boot
after
configuration.
Have fixed the network and all seems to be fine.
Thanks
Roshan
----- Original Message -----
From: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:41 pm
Subject: Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and VLAN tagging.
To: Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, zones-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Gerdts writes:
On 10/23/06, Roshan Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
zonecfg:sz44bsdvapdqc02:net> set address=10.165.20.35/23
That should be:
set address=10.165.20.35
You will then need an entry in the global zone's
/etc/netmasks to
ensure that the netmask is set properly as the zone is booted.
There's nothing wrong with CIDR notation here. In fact, I'd
recommend> that users prefer CIDR and shy away from the ancient
and feeble
/etc/netmasks interface.
See the zonecfg(1M) man page for details.
That's not the problem the user is seeing. The problem the
user is
experienced appears to be CR 6367840 -- fixed in Nevada, but
not
S10.>
--
James Carlson, KISS Network
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive
71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1
781
442 1677
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
zones-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
