[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12697182#action_12697182
 ] 

Flavio Paiva Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-29:
-------------------------------------------------

Mahadev, I'm ok with moving the interface and the implementations of the 
interface elsewhere, but I'm not sure I understand your proposal. On my side, I 
need an interface to represent any implementation that takes a set of servers 
and verifies if that set is a quorum or not. I currently have two 
implementations: one for majority and one for loading a quorum system from a 
file in the way described above. The implementation of the second one is not 
complete yet. In fact, I haven't implemented most of it.

I find mixing this quorum representation with the current configuration a 
little messy, especially because it is an optional feature and it does 
correspond to a simple value loaded from a file. We need some logic to perform 
quorum verification aside from values that we load from a separate 
configuration file. 

> Flexible quorums
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-29
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-29.patch
>
>
> Moved from SourceForge to Apache.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1938782&group_id=209147&atid=1008547

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to