[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12699336#action_12699336
]
Flavio Paiva Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-29:
-------------------------------------------------
Mahadev, thanks for checking it out. Here are answers to your questions:
1- With this patch, it defaults to majority if there is no declaration of
groups and weights. We currently use majority quorums;
2- No, the example is fine. You have a quorum if you have at least two servers
from two different groups;
3- I don't see a reason for having groups in a first cut and weights in a
second. In fact, one typical way of specifying quorums is to assign weights, so
even if a user is not interested in groups, the user can declare one group and
assign weights.
> Flexible quorums
> ----------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-29
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Patrick Hunt
> Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch
>
>
> Moved from SourceForge to Apache.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1938782&group_id=209147&atid=1008547
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
