Stu Hood commented on ZOOKEEPER-29:
This ticket seems to overlap with ZOOKEEPER-368 to some degree: wouldn't an
Observer simply be a server in the quorum that wouldn't get to vote on proposed
I find mixing this quorum representation with the current configuration a
little messy, especially because it is an optional feature and it does
correspond to a simple value loaded from a file. We need some logic to perform
quorum verification aside from values that we load from a separate
It could probably correspond to a key loaded from a flat file, if the key was
hierarchial. It would require a bit of a config overhaul: rather than
.. you'd want
...so then weight is optional, which defaults to an equal weight for all
> Flexible quorums
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-29
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29
> Project: Zookeeper
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: server
> Reporter: Patrick Hunt
> Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch,
> Moved from SourceForge to Apache.
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.