Stu Hood commented on ZOOKEEPER-29:

Two comments:


This ticket seems to overlap with ZOOKEEPER-368 to some degree: wouldn't an 
Observer simply be a server in the quorum that wouldn't get to vote on proposed 


I find mixing this quorum representation with the current configuration a 
little messy, especially because it is an optional feature and it does 
correspond to a simple value loaded from a file. We need some logic to perform 
quorum verification aside from values that we load from a separate 
configuration file.
It could probably correspond to a key loaded from a flat file, if the key was 
hierarchial. It would require a bit of a config overhaul: rather than
.. you'd want
...so then weight is optional, which defaults to an equal weight for all 

> Flexible quorums
> ----------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-29
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-29
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: server
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Flavio Paiva Junqueira
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, ZOOKEEPER-29.patch, 
> ZOOKEEPER-29.patch
> Moved from SourceForge to Apache.
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1938782&group_id=209147&atid=1008547

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to