Hasn't ZC moded to fsfs ? It's as easy to setup as bdb and doesn't have the "getting stuck" problem. fsfs is used in production in many places now.
Florent Chris McDonough wrote: > I have two observations: > > - bdb tends to need recovery from time to time and I'm not sure of the > feasibility of filesystem-based Subversion repos, and CVS really > doesn't have this issue. > > - If we put something in Subversion and keep something in CVS, > merging becomes a chore. All of the code should really be > in one or the other. The current state of the world wrt to > Zope 2.7 in CVS and 2.8/HEAD in Subversion is a real pain. > > - C > > > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:44 +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote: > >>Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>>How about migrating CMF to subversion too? I'd say, 1.5 and HEAD. >>> >>>To be honest, I don't see the point in that. >> >>Well it would make things homogenous with the rest of Zope and >>Zope-related projects. And you could do checkouts of Zope + CMF or Plone >>+ CMF or CPS + CMF with only a few well placed svn:externals in one >>command. >> >>And frankly merging and cheap branches and having diff -r PREV:BASE >>makes svn much nicer to use day to day. >> >>The cvs2svn script is quite mature, migrating is not difficult in >>itself, and ZC has already done it for Zope. >> >>Florent >> > > -- Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D +33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests