Hasn't ZC moded to fsfs ? It's as easy to setup as bdb and doesn't have
the "getting stuck" problem. fsfs is used in production in many places now.


Chris McDonough wrote:
> I have two observations:
> - bdb tends to need recovery from time to time and I'm not sure of the
>   feasibility of filesystem-based Subversion repos, and CVS really
>   doesn't have this issue.
> - If we put something in Subversion and keep something in CVS,
>   merging becomes a chore.  All of the code should really be
>   in one or the other.  The current state of the world wrt to
>   Zope 2.7 in CVS and 2.8/HEAD in Subversion is a real pain.
> - C
> On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 15:44 +0200, Florent Guillaume wrote:
>>Jens Vagelpohl  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>How about migrating CMF to subversion too? I'd say, 1.5 and HEAD.
>>>To be honest, I don't see the point in that.
>>Well it would make things homogenous with the rest of Zope and
>>Zope-related projects. And you could do checkouts of Zope + CMF or Plone
>>+ CMF or CPS + CMF with only a few well placed svn:externals in one
>>And frankly merging and cheap branches and having diff -r PREV:BASE
>>makes svn much nicer to use day to day.
>>The cvs2svn script is quite mature, migrating is not difficult in
>>itself, and ZC has already done it for Zope.

Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   http://nuxeo.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to