On May 4, 2005, at 3:54 , Chris McDonough wrote:
- bdb tends to need recovery from time to time and I'm not sure of the feasibility of filesystem-based Subversion repos, and CVS really doesn't have this issue.
That's one of the biggest reasons why I would not want to be involved in administering a SVN setup. CVS requires nearly no management for small projects like CMF, except for software upgrades once in a while. And those can be automated.
- If we put something in Subversion and keep something in CVS, merging becomes a chore. All of the code should really be in one or the other. The current state of the world wrt to Zope 2.7 in CVS and 2.8/HEAD in Subversion is a real pain.
If we move I would also argue for a complete move.
_______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests