Il giorno mer, 22/11/2006 alle 07.34 +0100, Maciej Wisniowski ha scritto: > > Yes. ZPsycopgDA can be under the ZPL because the ZPL is GPL-compatible. > > But if you directly include GPL'ed code you must use GPL. > > > OK. Thanks for the answer. One more question. > If I'll create application using ZPsycopgDA which > is ZPL (but ZPsycopgDA uses psycopg which is GPL), > then does my application have to be GPL too?
I've seen infinite discussions about what a "mere aggregate" is and if using a standard API from an interpreted programming language is linking or not. psycopg2 is under the GPL so if you derive an adapter from it it should be under the GPL too. If you derive from ZPsycopgDA or write an app that used ZPysocpgDA you can go with anuthing compatible with the ZPL. Being the copyright holder for both I can choose any combination of licenses and by saying that ZPsycopgDA is (also) ZPL even if it calls psycopg that is GPL-only I suppose I am making a clear statement about what you can or can't do. > Can I submit this issue somewhere (AFAIK there > is no bugtracker at initd.org) or this e-mail > is enough? Please use our tracker at http://initd.org/tracker/psycopg. Thank you very much, federico -- Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog Debian GNU/Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] INIT.D Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Viviamo in un mondo reale, Ciccio. -- Lucy
Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente
_______________________________________________ Zope-DB mailing list Zope-DB@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db