-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 10:29 pm, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> On 22.10.2004, at 14:38, Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Given that the change was required to implement a security fix, and
> > without a reproducible test case for the reported breakage, I don't
> > think we can credit the rumors.  We *definitely* don't want to defer
> > the security fix.
>
> I still don't know what the security fix actually fixes, but that may
> well be my ignorance ;-). Your checkin message just mentions the
> removal of DWIMy code...

Actually, this is a point I wanted to make a long time ago. I believe there 
would have been less confusion all around (and some still lingers) if there 
had have been more information in the checkin message than "DWIMy code". DWIM 
only really has meaning to certain sets of "I".


    Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFBfCFgrGisBEHG6TARAkyNAJ43FD5zX6JLNfCsrEJ48jn3eKfyTwCY+HVT
FzEaLBC9VAJHUDrC+Se/yw==
=Oehq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to