Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-4-18 20:54 +0200: > ... >--On 18. April 2006 18:52:10 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-17 14:53 -0700: >>> ... >>> Yes, it does sound like a better solution. However, the issue I see >>> with it is that it is essentially adding new functionality, rather >>> than fixing a problem with the existing behavior. That would seem to >>> make it a much less likely candidate for getting into zope 2.8.7 >>> (which is important IMHO), despite the fact that it is a bit more >>> elegant >> >> It is a new functionality -- but one that does nothing until it >> is used and only for those applications (like "five:traversal") >> that use it. >> >> Thus, even a strict release manager might accept it. > >Am I strict? :-)
Do you accept it? ;-) -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
