Previously Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: > On 12 Aug 2007, at 21:45 , Tino Wildenhain wrote: > >Maybe I missed the thread but why was LP choosen over for example > >Trac? > > Because we don't have to maintain it or host it. I don't think we > have the amount of volunteers (feel free to convince me otherwise :)). > > >The latter would at least work very well with the SVN repository > > I'm not sure how far along Trac's multi-project/single-repository > integration is. As far as I'm aware, however, Trac would poorly fit > our repository structure. > > That's not to say I don't like Trac. I've used it and I like it. > Plone seems to be able to use it quite well, but they also have > people worrying about it and maintaining it constantly.
We haven't needed to touch trac in months actually. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )