Dieter Maurer wrote:
I, too, feel it is wrong
to use "implements(...)" when the class does not implement "...".

All declarations should be trustable -- otherwise, you could forget
about interfaces alltogether...

On some occasions you just can't fulfill an entire interface, and for whatever reason can't or don't want to create a super interface that you *can* fulfill so you do the best you can and raise NotImplemented when you can't.

I don't know anything about this situation, so I don't know if that approach is warranted here.
Benji York
Senior Software Engineer
Zope Corporation
Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to