On 23/10/2007, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Laurence Rowe wrote at 2007-10-23 12:00 +0100:
> >Lennart Regebro wrote:
> > ...
> >> I guess we need to either actually implement the relevant interfaces,
> >> or split the interfaces into something that can be implemented...
> >>
> >
> >Preferably not too far down the class hierarchy. It would be useful for
> >things such as cmf's PortalFolder not to implement IContainer directly,
> >it makes non-zodb content much easier if an adapter can be used.
> Are you abusing adapters?
>   If not, it should not matter whether the object implements
>   an interface directly or whether an adapter is needed...

Possibly, but I just want the higher level CMF functionality without
assumptions about the lower level functionality (would not be a
problem in a pure zope 3 environment).

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to