Andreas Jung wrote at 2008-3-24 09:00 +0100:
>Chris favors a 'big' Zope egg with some dependencies (like ZODB) stripped
>out. I would prefer a more broader approach. One of the reasons are
>company-internals modifications to the Zope core. Right now we maintain a
>more or less heavy modified version of Zope 2.8 in our repos (making Zope
>pretty hard). A better modularization would help us here.
I object that upgrades are "pretty hard" and I doubt that modularization
would help in any way:
Upgrades are hard only when local modifications and global
This does not happen too often and how often it happens is
independent from the modularization.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -