Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kent Tenney wrote:
Look at Sphinx for providing brilliant access to ReST doc.
I think looking at Sphinx is definitely a worthwhile effort. That said,
I agree with Martin that we shouldn't let the new website effort be held
up by (or distracted by) technological fixes. Let's focus on
introduction texts primarily, at least to get the initial website in the
If people want to explore how Sphinx can be used to publish more
technical documentation about Zope 3, I think this would be a very good
effort, though. Perhaps start with a smaller Zope packages, such as
zope.component, and see how it goes. The hard part will remain the
actual writing of the content.
Also, the main zope.org site may not be the best UI for browsing and
searching API documentation. Sun has a separate design for Javadocs on
its site; Python has a separate layout for its documentation on
python.org. Having an api.zope.org that's generated using a different
toolset, which we link to when necessary, is probably better for the end
user and easier for us to maintain.
Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -