Fred Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can't see any problems with this, can anyone else?
> There's the backward-compatibility issue, which is a showstopper.
> There's plenty of code that does this:
>     adapter = package.interfaces.IFoo(object, None)
> Changing the signature as you describe would break all code that does this.

How about a new major revision of zope.interface then?

I thought the pointless yoke of backwards compatability was something 
only Microsoft yearned for? ;-)



Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to