Chris Withers wrote at 2008-9-8 18:34 +0100:
>> There's the backward-compatibility issue, which is a showstopper.
>> There's plenty of code that does this:
>> adapter = package.interfaces.IFoo(object, None)
>> Changing the signature as you describe would break all code that does this.
>How about a new major revision of zope.interface then?
I fear that would be a bit drastic -- for a mostly cosmetic change.
But interfaces might grow an additional method, e.g. "adapt",
which could get the new signature.
The syntax would be a bit more cumbersome -- but on the other
hand, it would be more explicit :-)
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -