On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 27.10.2008 16:28 Uhr, Rudá Porto Filgueiras wrote: > >> I will sugest a package called zope.memcached (like zope.sqlalchemy >> does for SQLAlchemy integration). >> That way any application who need to talk memcached can do it with out >> loose atomicit. > > I don't see a particular reason for creating a new package for here. > Extend lovely.memcached and your done. There is not much need for scattering > tiny functionalies into two modules here. The module world is already > complicated enough.
If lovely,memcached alredy is safe when some Exception is raised, discard my sugestion. It's also compatible with zope2? > Andreas > -- ===================================== Rudá Porto Filgueiras Weimar Consultoria http://python-blog.blogspot.com Hospedagem Plone, Django, Zope 3, Grok... http://www.pytown.com ===================================== _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
