On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:05, Shane Hathaway <sh...@hathawaymix.org> wrote: >> Stephan Richter wrote: >>> On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Shane Hathaway wrote: >>>> Brainstorming deeper: we could apply a naming convention where the >>>> specification package is named with the suffix "spec", so zope.location >>>> would be split into zope.location and zope.locationspec. >>> >>> what about zope.ilocation? >> >> Maybe. I'd lean toward "zope.locationspec" because it would appear >> right after zope.location in a sorted list, making it more apparent that >> they are related. > > zope.location.interfaces?
This will not make any change in dependency graph unless zope.location become a namespace package. -- Baiju M _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
