On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 04:05, Shane Hathaway <sh...@hathawaymix.org> wrote:
>> Stephan Richter wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>>> Brainstorming deeper: we could apply a naming convention where the
>>>> specification package is named with the suffix "spec", so zope.location
>>>> would be split into zope.location and zope.locationspec.
>>> what about zope.ilocation?
>> Maybe.  I'd lean toward "zope.locationspec" because it would appear
>> right after zope.location in a sorted list, making it more apparent that
>> they are related.
> zope.location.interfaces?

This will not make any change in dependency graph unless zope.location
become a namespace package.

Baiju M
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to