Hi there,

In general splitting up interfaces from implementations would help 
pluggability. That said, I'm not very much in favor of such a split up 
of so many packages at the moment, as the case for pluggability will 
need to be made first for each new package created.

I think we should focus on reducing circular dependencies and 
pluggability improvements where there are concrete benefits, before we 
start to think of more general patterns.

I'd therefore like to see more concrete proposals (or actual 
implementation) for rearranging of code in packages instead of general 
pattern proposals. I know my discussion of splitting off ZCML 
implementations out of packages foundered because many people would only 
see the general proposal as acceptable but then found it *unacceptable* 
because it'd generate so many new packages. :)



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to