Hi there, In general splitting up interfaces from implementations would help pluggability. That said, I'm not very much in favor of such a split up of so many packages at the moment, as the case for pluggability will need to be made first for each new package created.
I think we should focus on reducing circular dependencies and pluggability improvements where there are concrete benefits, before we start to think of more general patterns. I'd therefore like to see more concrete proposals (or actual implementation) for rearranging of code in packages instead of general pattern proposals. I know my discussion of splitting off ZCML implementations out of packages foundered because many people would only see the general proposal as acceptable but then found it *unacceptable* because it'd generate so many new packages. :) Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
