On 5 July 2011 11:10, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote: > On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote: > > On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting<ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > >> So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or > >> 5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the > >> most sensible one :) > > > > > > Boy, that's going to be confusing. :) > > > > I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with > the > > defunct Zope 3, although I don't think there are any particularly good > > options here. > > I actually think it's a brilliant idea to "skip" 3.0 and call it 4.0. > > As Martin said, the potential for confusion is very high. A 4.0 would > not only steer around confusing Zope3 3.x and Zope2 3.x, it would also > make it easier to move back to the simple "Zope" moniker without any > qualifying number tacked on. People who only look at version numbers > would now choose Zope 4.0 instead of falling into the "unmaintained" > Zope3 trap.
I would tend to agree, given that we now have Blue Bream. Martin
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )