-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Am 05.07.2011 12:04, schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli <optilude+li...@gmail.com>
>> On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
>>> So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
>>> 5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the
>>> most sensible one :)
>> Boy, that's going to be confusing. :)
>> I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the
>> defunct Zope 3, although I don't think there are any particularly good
>> options here.
> Zope2 4.0 would imply some sort of upgrade path from Zope 3 to this.
> That's as confusing as anything else and would lead to the question
> what happened to Zope2 3.0.
> Since we don't market Zope2 anymore, I think there's actually much
> less confusion from this than we'd fear. It's just an internal version
> number used in some buildout files, not something that has any
> particular meaning.
I don't like either of these solutions. And I don't agree with Hanno,
that it's 'just an internal version number'. It will show up on
zope.org, launchpad.net, and many more places.
I would rather bump the version number to 2.20 to highlight the major
changes, and keep the 2 as major for Zope2 versions.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -