On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie <y.2...@wcm-solutions.de> wrote: > > Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these > > projects/deployments at least a few more years. > > Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a while. I just > expect to see active maintenance from the Plone community to stop in a > year or two. Judging from the ongoing maintenance we currently have > for Zope 2.10 or 2.11 I don't think it's very realistic to expect much > to happen once the Plone guys stop. > > >> What I'm outlining here has of course almost nothing to do with the > >> original idea and scope of Zope 2. Maybe at some point this should get > >> a different name ;-) > > > > I don't want to discuss names, but I think the next release from Zope > > trunk should be explicitly a new *major* release. > > I think that's perfectly fine. Since I broke backwards compatibility > with a number of changes I did, a major version increase is warranted. > > So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or > 5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the > most sensible one :)
Boy, that's going to be confusing. :) I'd actually favour calling it Zope2 4.0 just to avoid any mix-up with the defunct Zope 3, although I don't think there are any particularly good options here. Martin
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
