On Jan 10, 2013, at 14:45 , Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 2013, at 14:37 , Jim Fulton <j...@zope.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Jens Vagelpohl <j...@dataflake.org> wrote:
>>>> For those packages that are fully migrated you will have obvious markers 
>>>> on the package in svn.zope.org, such as the package being read-only.
>>> I don't think being read only is enough.  Are people supposed to
>>> attempt commits to find out if a project is read-only?
>>> We should at least leave something like a MOVED_TO_GITHUB file in the
>>> project, in addition to making it read only.
>> That's what I meant by "obvious marker, such as...". I did not imply making 
>> a package read-only is the only marker.
> But that's all that has been done for some projects.  (Sorry, I don't
> mean to be critical and I didn't raise the issue when it happened.)
> OTOH, it's been argued (I disagree :) that I did too much for the ZODB
> projects.  I think it would be helpful if we agreed on what should
> done, so we have a standard play book.

Please get in touch with Tres if you think his migrations should be improved. 
All other repositories (Zope, Products.*) were test migrations where I asked 
for feedback and never got any. They are throw-away and not final. The only 
finished migrations are yours and Tres'.


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to