[Stephan Richter] > ... > Overall I agree with Jim on his comments. We have been extremely careful not > to step on anyones toes and provide as smooth of a transition as possible.
Impending releases always create panic. Embrace it as an opportunity for spreading joy ;-) > We asked repeatedly for feedback/testing and all the tests are passing > (including ZEO). The ZEO _tests_ set up their own asyncore mainloop. If you think about it, it has to be that way, else we couldn't run the ZEO tests from a standalone ZODB checkout. > Alone the thought that ZEO depends on the server Zope is using, makes me > worried about ZEO; but then Jim just figured out that there is no problem. ;-) There is a problem, but it in one sense it's shallow: it only takes a few lines of code to set up an asyncore mainloop ZEO is maximally happy with. The hard part for Jim will be figuring out where to put them ;-) The deeper problem is that ZEO _ever_ relied on "someone else" to set up a mainloop; Jim sent a note about that to zodb-dev today (ZEO should change to set up its own asyncore cruft). _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
