Tres Seaver wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 07:18:05AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
| We should proceed by getting Z2 and Z3 to use a common
| publisher, presumingly based on the Z3 publisher. This common
| publisher should:
| - Be well documented and tested.
| - Use WSGI for HTTP
| - Be backward compatible with Both Z2 and Z3
| - Should be highly customizable through components. This will
| hopefully allow z2-stype and z3-style publication to coexist in
| a single app server.
| Again, I expect that the Z3 publisher will be the best starting point.
| Note that the Z3 publication framework splits functionality
| currently provided by the Z2 publisher into a publisher and a
| publication object. An initial step might be top come up with
| a Z2 publication object that works with the Z3 publisher.
You haven't said anything about the server. I assume this Z3/Z2
publication object hybrid would run with with the Z3 server instead of
the Z2 ZServer.
If WSGI lives up to its promise, then the WSGI-compliant Z2-Z3 hybrid
would be publishable as a "WSGI application" from any WSGI server,
including perhaps mod_python-based servers.
Ob. note: the performance characteristics of such servers (including
twisted) are not well understood in the context of Zope, until some
brave soul actually rolls out a high-volume production site and reports
success or failure.
Good point! It would be good to investigate this issue further.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
Zope3-dev mailing list