Jim Fulton wrote:
One issue though is that I want to replace ZConfig with a ZConfig format for zcml. (This would include making ZCML extensible to accept any other format.) The user experience would be the same, but extending it would be a lot easier than extensing ZConfig. I plan to make a proposal for this in the next few days.
Running ahead of your proposal, I wonder whether you mean using ZConfig's syntax to replace ZCML's syntax, or replace ZConfig's syntax with ZCML syntax. Both are fundamentally different approaches, but I can read either in what you say here. :)
Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3email@example.com Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com