Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
One issue though is that I want to replace ZConfig with a ZConfig
format for zcml. (This would include making ZCML extensible to accept
any other format.) The user experience would be the same, but
extending it would be a lot easier than extensing ZConfig. I plan to
make a proposal for this in the next few days.
Running ahead of your proposal, I wonder whether you mean using
ZConfig's syntax to replace ZCML's syntax, or replace ZConfig's syntax
with ZCML syntax. Both are fundamentally different approaches, but I can
read either in what you say here. :)
Neither. I want to use ZCML's machinery to implement ZConfig's
- make it easier to define/customize ZConfig options, and
- maintain one rather than 2 configuration systems.
The end-user experience would be the same.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
Zope3-dev mailing list