On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 09:36:37AM +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: > On 4/23/06, Andreas Reuleaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think the naming <browser2:page> vs. <browser:publish> vs. ... is > > not that important as the original name <browser:page> can be > > reintruduced (with the meaning of the new concept) after the > > deprecation period, i. e. I am thinking of having two (maybe three or > > four) different periods: > > We can't deprecate a zcml statement for the introducion of a statement > that we know is gonna be deprecated. It makes no sense.
Sorry, I wonder if you read my suggestion carefully. In particular I suggested having a period where only the new (and ugly) statement is allowed, and only after that to reintroduce the old statment with a new meaning. Such things (reintroduction of a known notation with a new meaning) are happening in the Python language itself as I pointed out, so I assume it makes some sense. -Andreas > > -- > Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ > CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Zope3-dev mailing list > Zope3-dev@zope.org > Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/reuleaux%40web.de > > > > !DSPAM:444b6fce120951804284693! _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
