On Aug 11, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

Jim Fulton wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Let's have a bug day this Friday.

So how did that go?

Riiiiight. Well, one of my server got hacked badly. I know, it's a poor excuse, but I ended up spending my whole long weekend (the only vacation time I had set aside for this summer) wiping the damn hard drive of that
thing and reinstalling everything from backup, instead of fixing some
bugs on Friday and spending some quality time with my li'l sisters...

:)  I really wish some more people would help out -- not just the usual

I see what I can do this weekend. I'll look into 673 and see whether I
can make sense of 683.

Christian seems to have a handle on this. He blames it on broken logic
in mkzopeinstance.

(I'm confident that eggs will clean up a lot of this. I'm looking forward to eggifying 3.4. :))

Actually, talking about 683: I once noticed that Zope 3 is declaring
'zope' as a namespace package the setuputils way where as Zope 2 does it
the pkg_util way. I wonder which one is the one we should stick with?

I've been meaning to ask Phillip Eby about that. I'm curious why he wrote his
thing given pkg_util.

How's that? Can I be a release manager? ;)

Yes please!

Great! I have perfected my nagging skills.


Jim Fulton                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                Python 
CTO                             (540) 361-1714                  
Zope Corporation        http://www.zope.com             http://www.zope.org

Zope3-dev mailing list
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to