Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2006-11-15 15:08 +0100: > ... >> def myStrAdapter(something): >> return str(something) >It instantiates a 'str' object. The 'str' object is the adapter for >'something'.
Huh? This would be a severe terminology abuse: An adapter should adapt something to something else *BUT* an "str" object does not adapt anything (it does not operate on another object). >'myStrAdapter' is the adapter factory. In my view, *this* is the adapter (adapting "something" to "str") and not an adapter factory (as its result is a string object which does not adapt anything)... -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list [email protected] Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
