On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Uwe Oestermeier wrote:
...
My preference would be to leave everthing as it is


That's not possible, as we're changing out packaging technology. (See my separate note to Baiju.)

and include zope.fssync
as a dependency and
zope.app.fssync as a part of the egg. Alternatively I can try to move the
code of zope.app.fssync
(and zope.app.file.fssync etc.) to zope.fssync.

-1

Just move zope.app.file.fssync to it's own project.


I can live with both alternatives, of course, but in my opinion it makes
sense to leave the
Python API (independent of ZODB and locations etc.) in zope.fssync and the
web-based API
(with security and location aware pickler) in zope.app.fssync.

Agreed.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton                      mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                Python 
Powered!
CTO                             (540) 361-1714                  
http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation        http://www.zope.com             http://www.zope.org



_______________________________________________
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to