On 8/9/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree, the site concept is about locality, which is a concept on top of > zope.component.
Perhaps a reasonable description; I'd describe it more as a tool for internal organization of an application. > I think "site" is widely understood term in Zope 3 now and everyone knows > about it. We gain absolutely nothing by renaming it. I think "zope.site" > would be a great package name for "ISite" and friends. Widely understood, yes. Frankly, I've *never* liked it, because it doesn't tightly relate to my more casual ideas on what a "site" is on the web. It compontent registry *can* represent a site in that sense, but that's as much an implementation detail as anything (IMO). The existing APIs certainly can't change, but I'd love to see more reasonable name used for a new package that's less tied to supporting web applications. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
