On Thursday 02 February 2006 15:07, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Those very > same Plone and Zope 2 developers will be more likely to push towards Zope > 3 if they feel others are using it, are convinced it has a future, and are > convinced they will be able to collaborate with developers on unrelated > products.
My sense from the sprint is that developers here use Zope 3 on its technical merits and not its marketing ones. I am personally not that interested in Zope 3 being chosen because of PR. When I signed up as a contributor (btw, I was the first one) it was because I wanted to develop Zope. I already knew that I did not like the CMF due to technical reasons and wanted to bring Zope itself forward. So I joined the Zope 3 effort. I never considered this effort to be anything else but ensuring the future of Zope. I recognized that Zope 2 had lost its edge to its competitors and it was necessary to come up with a new one. Having said that, I feel very strongly that built Zope version 3 and nothing more or less. And I feel that a name change would betray me and my intentions. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3email@example.com http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users