On Friday 08 February 2008, Roger Ineichen wrote: > what do you think should we start something like > z3c.formwidget.(xy) for new z3c.form widgets? You know > we also can port some widgets form our other projects then.
Yes, I think it is time to start a new package for additional widgets. z3c.formwidget sounds good to me. > My personal favorit for a password widget is an additional > schema which defines a confirmation field and uses this schema > and will setup the widgets explicit. The reason for this > is that the form concept 100% fits the requirements and this > can be done without any magic because Invariant is supported. > Also note that the same password widget is not allways used > within a confirmation field if it comes to login. > Here is some code: After reading your arguments a couple of times, I agree that your approach is better. It should be done this way. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter Web Software Design, Development and Training Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope3-users mailing list Zope3firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-users