On Friday 08 February 2008, Roger Ineichen wrote:
> what do you think should we start something like
> z3c.formwidget.(xy) for new z3c.form widgets? You know
> we also can port some widgets form our other projects then.
Yes, I think it is time to start a new package for additional widgets.
z3c.formwidget sounds good to me.
> My personal favorit for a password widget is an additional
> schema which defines a confirmation field and uses this schema
> and will setup the widgets explicit. The reason for this
> is that the form concept 100% fits the requirements and this
> can be done without any magic because Invariant is supported.
> Also note that the same password widget is not allways used
> within a confirmation field if it comes to login.
> Here is some code:
After reading your arguments a couple of times, I agree that your approach is
better. It should be done this way.
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
Zope3-users mailing list