On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 09:20:52AM +1200, Phillip Hutchings wrote:
> > Well, it doesn't distinguish between an attribute which doesn't exist
> > and an attribute which has any false value. This makes it unsuitable as
> > a hasattr() replacement IMHO.
> But you're asking if the object posesses an attribute, not any
> question about the value of the object. I think returning false if the
> value is false is potentially dangerous - I may want to retrieve a
> false value.
"But" what? You just said the same thing that I said :-)
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -