On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 09:22:12AM +0100, Bernard Hill wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Richard Robinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Is "K:D exp _b _e ^f" different from "K:D _b _e ^f" ? > >Where does this come from, has it been mentioned before ? > > As I have always understood the standard, the accidentals following it > *modify* the key sig. So > > K:D _b _e ^f actuall leaves also a c^. The point of the exp is to > *override* the normal key sig of D.
I thought that discussion had already happened. -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
