On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 12:36:17PM +0200, I. Oppenheim wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Richard Robinson wrote: > > > > > K:D _b _e ^f actuall leaves also a c^. The point of the exp is to > > > > *override* the normal key sig of D. > > > > [1] The given example actually produces 1 sharp and 2 flats, ie is > > equivalent to "D exp". > > Nope. As I have explained earlier, "K:D _b _e ^f" > is equivalent to "K:D maj _b _e ^f". If you want a key > sig with only "_b _e ^f" you *must* specify "K:D exp _b _e ^f"
Please. This is getting daft. My statement, I hope, made it clear, as it isn't in the quote here, that it described the actual behaviour of an actual program. If you disagree with it, as that, I suggest you test it for yourself and see. I *know* that behaviour is not as you say it should be. > If there are still questions about the key signatures > syntax, please send them to me off-list. It's not a question, but I've left it here in case anybody else is getting confused. <hollow laughter> -- Richard Robinson "The whole plan hinged upon the natural curiosity of potatoes" - S. Lem To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
