On 19 Aug 2004, at 16:37, Steven Bennett wrote:
"K:" by itself is not documented in ANY version of the ABC spec as a valid
sequence, and cannot be assumed to work in any program. In my own parser,
again, that would cause an error on the field, which would cause the field
to be ignored (in an attempt to recover), which would then cause all kinds
of havoc. Stick with "K:none" instead.
Agreed. The bare K: is most likely to be an error (user couldn't immediately
figure out the correct entry, and put it off until later, then forgot about it).
Programs should flag it as an error, rather than assuming that it means C.
Phil Taylor
To subscribe/unsubscribe, point your browser to: http://www.tullochgorm.com/lists.html
