--- "John G. Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Time has to included maybe?
Now it is getting complicated. I was thinking of Shane Legg's universal intelligence, expressed in terms of the shortest program that could achieve the same measure. Of course this only makes sense in the context of Turing machines, which are infinitely fast. But it seems a lot of people prefer to measure intelligence in the subset of environments that are relevant to people, which is a much harder thing to define. We already have measures of intelligence for our computers: memory, disk space, clock speed, MIPS and MFLOPS on various benchmarks... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Mahoney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 7:55 AM > > To: agi@v2.listbox.com > > Subject: RE: [agi] Intelligence vs Efficient Intelligence > > > > > > --- "John G. Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did you arrive at some sort of unit for intelligence? Typically > > > measurements are constructed of combinations of basic units for > > example 1 > > > watt = 1 kg * m^2/s^3. Or is it not a unit but a set of units? > > > > It is a unitless number. It is measured in bits. > > > > (By some definitions. I can accept others). > > > > > > -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
