The space navigation system is a case in point. I listened to a talk by
Peter Norvig in which he talked about looking at the moton of the heavens in
an empirical way. Let's imagine angels and crystal spheres and see where we
get. He rather decried Newton and the apple. In fact the apple story isn't
true. Newton investigated gravity after discussion with Halley of comet
fame. Newton was not generous enough to admit this and came up the "*apple*"
story. In fact there is a 7th parameter - the planet's mass. This is needed
when you think about the effect that a planet has on the others. Adams and
Leverrier discovered Neptune in 1846 by looking at irregularities in the
orbit of Uranus.

Copernicus came up with the Heliocentric theory because Ptolomy's epicycles
were so cumbersome. In fact a planet can be characterised by 6 things. Its
major axis, its eccentricity, the plane of its orbit, the angle of the major
axis and the position in orbit - time. These parameters are constant unless
a third body is present.

How do we get to Saturn? Cassini had a series of encounters. We view each
encounter by calculating first a solar orbit and then a
Venusian/Terrestrial/Jovian orbit. Deep in an encounter a planet is the main
influence. 3 body problems are tricky and we do a numerical computation with
time steps. We have to work out first of all the series of encounters and
then the effects of inaccuracies. We need to correct, for example *before* we
encounter a planet.

How does this fit in with AGI? Well Peter I don't think you empirical
approach will get you to Saturn. There is the need for theoretical
knowledge. How is this knowledge represented in AGI? It is represented in an
abstract mathematical form, a form which describes a general planet and
incorporates the inverse square law.

What in fact we need to know about space navigation is whether our system
incorporates these abstract definitions. I would view AGI as something which
will understand an abstract definition. This is something a little meta
mathematical. It understands ellipses and planets in general and wants to
know how this knowledge is incorporated in our system. In fact I would view
AGI as something checking on the integrity of other programs.

*Abstract Language*
*
*
By this I mean an abstract grammatical description of a language, gender and
morphology. This is vital. I don't think our Peter has ever learnt Spanish
even, at least not properly. We can find out what morphology a word has once
we have a few examples if*f* we have a morphological description built in.


  - Ian Parker


> A narrow "embedded" system, like say a DMV computer network is not an AGI.
> But that doesn't mean an AGI could not perform that function. In fact, AGI
> might arise out of these systems needing to become more intelligent. And an
> AGI system, that same AGI software may be used for a DMV, a space
> navigation
> system, IRS, NASDAQ, etc. it could adapt. .. efficiently. There are some
> systems that tout multi-use now but these are basically very narrow AI. AGI
> will be able to apply it's intelligence across domains and should be able
> to
> put its feelers into all the particular subsystems. Although I foresee some
> types of standard interfaces perhaps into these narrow AI computer
> networks;
> some sort of intelligence standards maybe, or the AGI just hooks into the
> human interfaces...
>
> An AGI could become a God but also it could do some useful stuff like run
> everyday information systems just like people with brains have to perform
> menial labor.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to