On 19/08/2008, at 9:37 AM, Tom Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 15:38 -0700, Jeff Rogers wrote:
While I'd agree this is a bug in fastpath, the real problem is that
fastpath is being used at all in this case.

I don't think it is a bug in fastpath.

fastpath is making assumptions about what means something is the "same file", and those assumptions are not consistent with unix filesystem semantics - how is this not a bug?

sure, the original use case that triggered this seems non-optimal, and could be done in other ways that don't trigger the bug, but that doesn't mean fastpath is behaving correctly...


Russell


--
AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/

To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
with the
body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: 
field of your email blank.

Reply via email to