Hello Shinji,
Am 31.08.22 um 23:00 schrieb Shinji Enoki:
Hello Andreas, all,
Thank you for your questions.
- What are the criteria to measure the value of a contribution?
- Which are the criteria for a non trivial or obviously insignificant
contribution?
- Would your rating differ from areas of contribution?
I will write my understanding including this premise. I'd appreciate
it if you could point me out if I'm wrong.
We chose adopted a bottom-up approach contributors supporting and
meritocracy, in the governance model of The Document Foundation.
The reason why MC check contributions in membership applications is to
make TDF's governance system work. Contribution activities are
required to become a member, so it necessary to check it.
While § 10 is obviously referenced, we often refer to previously
discussed cases. This is not a standard, but it can be helpful.
As far as I can see, MC seems to be trying to maintain fairness by
having MC members with various positions and contributions come
together and discuss. That approach isn't perfect, but it seems to
work reasonably well. Of course, it's for fairness, doesn't improve
transparency.
For fairness and transparency in membership applications, a little
more detail criteria might work. However, there are many different
patterns of contributions, and it is not easy to create criteria that
work well.
Still, there may be a way to create MC documents with criteria that
are a little more detailed than § 10.
thanks for your answer and explaining the problems you and the whole MC
has to deal with.
Best,
Andreas
--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
