Hi all, Andreas Mantke wrote: > I read about the decision to create a new CoC committee from community > members > (https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg01000.html). > Just to insert here, that the new CoC process is, in my mind, unambiguously positive, and I'm very happy about the enlarged group of people handling it.
> And the board really decided instead of involving this own CoC committee > to throw a lot of _donation_ money on contracting an external > 'communication expert' (they are regularly very expensive)? > That is not what happens. A CoC verdict was not accepted by one of the parties, so the board is now getting neutral, external expertise. There's added value, in that arguably a completely external view on our interactions (board and elsewhere) can only improve how we collectively work. Rest assured, I would have preferred to avoid both the challenging situation, as well as any extra work (or expense). > I'm curious about a detailed explanation from the board, why the own TDF > CoC committee is incompetent for the handling of the situation. > That framing is untrue, and offensive towards the volunteers in the committee. Best, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
