Chris Lee
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:08:58 -0700
hxxp seems to be advantageous for a few reasons: 1. you can still cut and paste the url2. the protocol handlers won't load it up if you accidently click on it
3. you can add a protocol handler for hxxp for whatever you want 4. easier to recognize domains and patterns (rather than rotted urls) 5. already widely accepted in spam fighting groups 6. trivial to do and undo with no exception casesI figured I'd put down my thoughts to try to help a standard to move forward.
On Aug 28, 2008, at 7:07 PM, silky wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Chris Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi,I was wondering if it would be more helpful if we could propose a "standard" for posting broken URLs with some form of start/end indicator to alloweasier automated processing from the listings?I was thinking that it would be nice to post them just rot13'd. Still trivially decoded (i use leetkey add-in in ff) but not picked up by indexers/etc. Advantage is that it can still be searched for common patterns.ChrisB.-- noon silky http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/ _______________________________________________ botnets@, the public's dumping ground for maliciousnessAll list and server information are public and available to law enforcement upon request.http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets
_______________________________________________ botnets@, the public's dumping ground for maliciousness All list and server information are public and available to law enforcement upon request. http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets