2013/10/9 Folmer Fredslund <folm...@gmail.com> > Hi Navdeep, > > I feel disappointed. (not your fault) > > I was hoping to see what kind of science was behind the computer program > that generated the unique papers. That doesn't seem to be contained in the > linked article. > > The article does, however, seem to be lacking in peer review itself? Or > can anything be done in the name of journalism? Why were only open-access > journals selected? I guess I'm just repeating the questions that many > others have asked since the publication. >
An interesting response addressing this issue is given here: http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1439 Lucas
